The main topic of the article concerns the court proceedings and psychiatric evaluation of a boy named Kosta K., accused of a mass murder at the Vladislav Ribnikar elementary school in Belgrade. Psychiatric expert Dr. Aneta Lakić stated that the boy was highly self-focused, showed no remorse or guilt, and was aware that he would not be criminally responsible as he was under 14 years old at the time of the crime. The boy admitted he wanted to be a psychopath, inspired by American school massacre cases, but did not reveal a motive. The family’s lawyer disputed part of the evaluation, claiming the boy knew he would not be held criminally responsible. The topic is reported with different emphases across media, but all agree the case is tragic and complex, focusing on the boy’s psychological state and legal aspects of his actions.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning outlets tend to emphasize the psychological and social factors influencing the boy’s actions, highlighting the need for mental health support and systemic issues in youth care. They focus on the lack of remorse as a symptom of deeper psychological problems and question the adequacy of the legal system in dealing with minors in such cases.
Center: Center-leaning media report the facts of the case with a balanced approach, presenting the psychiatric evaluation and legal context without strong editorializing. They focus on the details of the court proceedings, the boy’s awareness of legal responsibility, and the implications for juvenile justice, maintaining a neutral tone.
Right: Right-leaning sources emphasize the severity of the crime and the need for accountability, often focusing on the boy’s admission of wanting to be a psychopath and the influence of American school shootings. They may stress the importance of law and order and the protection of society, sometimes questioning leniency in juvenile justice.
