The building of the Faculty of Fine Arts (FLU) in Cetinje, occupied only five years ago, is facing serious issues with leakage and moisture, leading to the announcement of a tender for its reconstruction. The problem has existed since the building was first occupied, and it has already undergone several minor adaptations that failed to resolve the fundamental defects. The Ministry of Public Works has issued a tender for the contractor, with the investment aimed at improving the functionality of the space and conditions for teaching, as well as preserving the architectural value of the building. Questions arise as to how a building with obvious construction flaws was granted a usage permit and who is responsible for the oversights. Students are dissatisfied with the conditions, which hinder their work, but hope that the reconstruction will permanently solve the problem.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning reports emphasize the failure of government oversight and accountability in allowing a poorly constructed building to be used for education. They highlight the impact on students and the need for systemic reforms in public infrastructure management. The narrative focuses on the neglect of public funds and the consequences for the academic community.
Center: Center-leaning reports present a balanced view, acknowledging the problems with the building and the steps taken by the Ministry of Public Works to address them through a tender for reconstruction. They focus on the technical details of the defects and the planned improvements, emphasizing the importance of maintaining architectural value and improving educational conditions.
Right: Right-leaning reports may focus on the inefficiency and mismanagement within public institutions, questioning the competence of those responsible for the building’s approval and maintenance. They might stress the need for stricter controls and accountability, possibly criticizing bureaucratic delays and the misuse of public funds.
