The main topic of the article is a scandal at the competition to select Yugoslavia’s representative for Eurovision, where Lepa Brena was the favorite with the song “Sitnije, cile, sitnije”, but ultimately another song “Džuli” by Danijel was chosen. Composer Kornelije Kovač admitted to using cunning to get Lepa Brena to Eurovision, but Danijel won in the end. The jury was divided, and the public was disappointed with the outcome. Lepa Brena realized that everything was rigged and that her song was popular among the people but not with the jury. The topic is presented as a conflict between traditional Balkan style and European criteria, emphasizing the injustice towards Lepa Brena and her musical expression.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning sources emphasize the injustice and manipulation in the selection process, highlighting how popular opinion and cultural authenticity were ignored in favor of political or elitist preferences. They sympathize with Lepa Brena as a representative of the common people and traditional Balkan music, criticizing the establishment for sidelining her.
Center: Centrist sources report the facts of the event, focusing on the competition results and the controversy without strong bias. They present statements from the composer and Lepa Brena, noting the divided jury and public reaction, and frame the event as a notable moment in the history of Yugoslav Eurovision participation.
Right: Right-leaning sources may emphasize national pride and cultural identity, portraying Lepa Brena as a symbol of authentic Yugoslav and Balkan culture. They criticize the jury’s decision as a betrayal of national interests and traditional values, framing the scandal as an example of external or elitist interference undermining local culture.
