The Football Association of Serbia (FSS) issued a statement in response to claims by Sebastian Kerkez that the FSS was disinterested in his son Milos Kerkez. The FSS emphasizes that the association has made multiple contacts with the Kerkez family and has shown a strong desire for Milos to wear the Serbian jersey. The director of youth categories, Nikola Lazetic, highlights that conversations with parents are a regular practice and that multiple contacts were made in Milos Kerkez’s case, including informal talks with his teammates. However, the Kerkez family has different plans, with father Sebastian openly stating that Milos will choose Hungary. The FSS expresses regret over attempts to undermine the credibility of the association and calls on young players to make heartfelt decisions about their national team futures.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning outlets tend to emphasize the supportive role of the Football Association of Serbia towards young talents and criticize the narrative of disinterest as misleading or unfair. They highlight the association’s efforts to engage with the player and his family and frame the issue as a matter of personal choice by the player rather than neglect by the association.
Center: Centrist sources report the facts of the Football Association’s statement and the claims made by Sebastian Kerkez in a balanced manner. They present both sides: the association’s multiple contacts and support efforts, and the family’s decision to consider other national options. The narrative is neutral, focusing on the communication between parties and the player’s future choices.
Right: Right-leaning media may emphasize patriotism and loyalty to the national team, praising players who choose to represent Serbia despite challenges. They might criticize the family for considering other countries and frame the Football Association’s efforts as sincere and dedicated. The narrative may also include a call for responsibility and commitment from players towards the national team.
