The new authorities in Sisak, led by HDZ and HSLS, have accused the former mayor Kristina Ikić Baniček and her deputy Marko Krička from SDP of possible favoritism, illegal employment, and non-transparent management of public funds. It was particularly highlighted that Krička, as the head of the scholarship committee, awarded a scholarship to his sister-in-law, enabling her employment in the city administration without a public competition. It was also confirmed that Krička had not published his asset declaration for over six months, violating laws on conflict of interest prevention. These revelations have raised questions about possible systematic legal violations and unethical management of city property and funds. The new authorities emphasize that the citizens of Sisak deserve transparent, responsible, and lawful governance without exceptions.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning outlets focus on the accusations as politically motivated attacks by the new HDZ-led majority against the former SDP administration. They emphasize the need for due process and warn against rushing to judgment without full investigation. The narrative often highlights the former officials’ contributions and questions the timing and intent of the accusations.
Center: Centrist sources report the facts of the accusations, presenting statements from both the new authorities and the accused former officials. They emphasize the importance of transparency and legal compliance in public administration, noting the seriousness of the allegations while awaiting further investigation outcomes.
Right: Right-leaning media emphasize the accusations as evidence of corruption and unethical behavior within the former SDP-led administration. They highlight the nepotism and legal violations, portraying the new HDZ-led authorities as committed to cleaning up the city administration and restoring lawful governance.
