Stubble burning after harvest in Serbia remains a widespread practice despite legal bans. Farmers often mistakenly believe that burning increases soil fertility, but experts emphasize that this practice destroys humus, beneficial microorganisms, and releases large amounts of carbon dioxide, contributing to climate change. The law imposes heavy fines for burning, but the problem remains unresolved. An alternative is plowing the residues into the soil, which improves fertility and reduces environmental damage. Additionally, there are other post-harvest activities that help preserve soil and increase yields.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning sources emphasize the environmental damage caused by stubble burning, highlighting its contribution to climate change and the destruction of soil health. They advocate for stricter enforcement of bans and support sustainable agricultural practices such as plowing residues back into the soil and organic farming methods.
Center: Center-leaning sources present a balanced view, acknowledging the traditional reasons farmers burn stubble, such as cost and ease, while also recognizing the environmental harm and legal restrictions. They focus on promoting awareness, education, and gradual adoption of better post-harvest practices.
Right: Right-leaning sources tend to emphasize the economic challenges faced by farmers, such as the cost and labor involved in alternative methods to burning. They may highlight the need for practical solutions that do not overly burden farmers financially, and sometimes question the strictness of regulations or advocate for incentives rather than penalties.