Students who want to study have decided to postpone their hunger strike until Vidovdan, June 28, expecting the state to resolve the situation at the faculties. Student representative Miloš Pavlović stated that this is not a political performance but the last step in their fight against injustice. This topic is reported differently across media with various political leanings, emphasizing different aspects of the students’ demands and the state’s response.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning media emphasize the students’ struggle for educational rights and frame the hunger strike as a legitimate form of protest against systemic neglect by the government. They highlight the social injustice and call for urgent government action to support students and improve educational conditions.
Center: Center-leaning outlets report the facts of the students’ decision to postpone the hunger strike, focusing on the dialogue between students and the government. They present the situation as a negotiation process and stress the importance of finding a peaceful resolution without escalating the conflict.
Right: Right-leaning media tend to downplay the political significance of the students’ protest, framing it as a non-political, isolated event. They may emphasize the need for order and criticize potential disruptions caused by protests, urging students to seek solutions through official channels rather than strikes.
