The United States and China have reached a trade agreement after two days of negotiations in London. President Donald Trump highlighted that the US will have access to China’s rare earth reserves, which was one of the main demands of the American delegation. The agreement also sets tariffs: 55% for the US and 10% for China. Trump stated that relations between Washington and Beijing are now excellent, although the negotiations were tough. The deal comes at a time when both countries are trying to stabilize trade relations that have been burdened in recent years by tariffs, export controls, and political tensions. However, there was no mention of easing US export controls, especially regarding semiconductor manufacturing. A court ruling allows tariffs to remain temporarily in place despite legal uncertainties.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning outlets tend to emphasize the challenges and political tensions that have characterized US-China trade relations, highlighting concerns about the impact of tariffs on global supply chains and workers. They may critique the deal as insufficient in addressing broader issues such as labor rights, environmental standards, and the strategic implications of access to rare earth minerals.
Center: Centrist sources report the agreement as a pragmatic step towards stabilizing strained trade relations between the US and China. They focus on the details of the deal, such as tariff rates and access to resources, and note the legal complexities surrounding tariffs. The tone is generally neutral, presenting the deal as a cautious but positive development.
Right: Right-leaning media emphasize the deal as a significant win for the US, highlighting President Trump’s role in securing access to China’s rare earth reserves and maintaining high tariffs to protect American industries. They portray the agreement as strengthening US economic and strategic positions, often downplaying ongoing legal challenges or criticisms.
