US President Donald Trump announced the achievement of a trade agreement with China after two days of negotiations in London. The agreement includes a reduction of tariffs from 55% to 10% for China, as well as allowing Chinese students to attend American universities. Trump emphasized that relations between Washington and Beijing are now excellent, although the negotiations were tough. The agreement also grants the US access to China’s rare earth reserves, which was one of the main demands of the US delegation. However, there was no mention of easing US export controls, particularly regarding semiconductor manufacturing. The agreement comes at a time when the US and China are trying to stabilize trade relations that have been burdened by tariffs and political tensions in recent years.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning outlets tend to emphasize the challenges and tensions that preceded the agreement, highlighting the difficulties in negotiations and the ongoing issues such as export controls and human rights concerns. They may view the agreement cautiously, noting that while it reduces tariffs, it does not fully resolve the underlying trade and political conflicts between the US and China.
Center: Center-leaning sources report the agreement as a positive step towards stabilizing trade relations between the US and China. They focus on the practical outcomes such as tariff reductions and increased educational exchanges, presenting the deal as a pragmatic solution to ongoing trade disputes without delving deeply into political controversies.
Right: Right-leaning media emphasize the successes of the Trump administration in securing favorable terms, such as significant tariff reductions and access to rare earth minerals. They highlight the strength and assertiveness of US trade policy and often portray the agreement as a win for American economic interests and national security.