The trial in the Dinamo 2 affair continues at the County Court in Osijek, where Croatian national team captain Luka Modrić testified about the circumstances of his transfers from Dinamo to Tottenham and Real Madrid. Modrić confirmed that Dinamo honored all contracts and that he had a good relationship with Zdravko Mamić, who was a key figure in his career. He stated that he did not participate in negotiations between clubs and was unaware of details about agents and financial arrangements. Testimonies from other players like Dejan Lovren indicate similar circumstances regarding transfers and the roles of Mamić and his associates. The prosecution accuses Mamić and others of embezzling money from the club through fictitious contracts and transfer brokerage. The trial has attracted significant public attention due to the involvement of well-known footballers and the seriousness of the charges.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning outlets emphasize the corruption and misuse of power by Zdravko Mamić and his associates, highlighting the exploitation of football players and the club’s finances. They focus on the need for accountability and systemic reforms in Croatian football and sports governance.
Center: Centrist sources report the facts of the trial objectively, focusing on the testimonies of Luka Modrić and other players, the legal proceedings, and the charges against Mamić and others. They provide balanced coverage without strong editorializing, emphasizing the judicial process and its implications for Croatian football.
Right: Right-leaning media may emphasize the personal integrity and professionalism of Luka Modrić and other players, portraying them as victims of a corrupt system. They might also criticize the length and impact of the trial on the individuals involved, sometimes suggesting political motivations behind the prosecution.
