The main topic of the article is an analysis of the new US foreign policy under Donald Trump’s administration, termed the “look the other way” doctrine. This doctrine marks a significant shift from previous American doctrines that focused on actively promoting democracy and human rights worldwide. Trump’s doctrine is characterized by restraint in criticizing authoritarian regimes and reducing US interference in other countries’ internal affairs, emphasizing business interests and pragmatic cooperation. The doctrine has been criticized for potentially strengthening repressive regimes and distancing the US from traditional allies who promote democracy. This topic is interpreted across different political media through ideological lenses, with left-leaning media highlighting the dangers of abandoning human rights advocacy, centrist media emphasizing pragmatism and realpolitik, and right-leaning media supporting a focus on national interests and reduced interventionism.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning media emphasize the negative consequences of Trump’s ‘look the other way’ doctrine, highlighting the abandonment of human rights and democracy promotion as a dangerous retreat that may embolden authoritarian regimes and undermine global democratic norms.
Center: Centrist media present the doctrine as a pragmatic shift towards realpolitik, recognizing the reduction in US interventionism as a way to focus on national interests and economic benefits, while acknowledging the risks of alienating traditional allies and weakening democratic advocacy.
Right: Right-leaning media generally support the doctrine, praising the focus on national sovereignty, business interests, and reduced foreign entanglements. They view it as a necessary correction to previous interventionist policies that overextended US resources and ignored American priorities.
