In some parts of Serbia, especially in smaller towns and villages, an unusual practice has emerged where a daughter-in-law marries her father-in-law to inherit his foreign currency pension. This practice, while legally permissible, raises ethical dilemmas and elicits varied reactions in society. Some condemn such marriages as immoral and unnatural, while others defend them as a consequence of poverty and inadequate legal frameworks. Stories about these marriages indicate that people exploit legal grey areas to survive difficult life circumstances, particularly amid economic crises and lack of systemic support.
Political Perspectives:
Left: The left-leaning narratives tend to emphasize the socio-economic hardships and systemic failures that drive people to such unconventional practices. They highlight poverty, lack of social support, and the need for legal reforms to protect vulnerable populations. The practice is often framed as a symptom of broader social inequality and economic desperation.
Center: Center-leaning reports focus on the factual aspects of the practice, acknowledging its legality while discussing the ethical and moral debates it sparks. They present balanced views, including personal stories and societal reactions, without strong judgment, emphasizing the complexity of the issue and the need for nuanced understanding.
Right: Right-leaning perspectives often stress the moral and traditional family values, condemning the practice as unnatural and unethical. They may highlight concerns about the erosion of social norms and the potential exploitation of legal loopholes, advocating for stricter laws and preservation of traditional marriage concepts.
