Two former leaders of the wellness startup OneTaste, Nicole Daedone and Rachel Cherwitz, have been found guilty of sexually exploiting employees. OneTaste was known for its practice of “orgasmic meditation,” presented as a method for spiritual growth and female pleasure. During the trial, it was revealed that employees were forced into sexual relations with VIP investors and clients, worked without pay, and were subjected to psychological manipulation and intimidation. The verdict has drawn significant attention and highlights the dark side of the wellness industry. The defense claimed these were spiritual teachings protected by the constitution, but the jury rejected these claims. The accused face up to 20 years in prison.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning outlets emphasize the exploitation and abuse of vulnerable women under the guise of wellness and spiritual growth. They highlight the systemic manipulation, coercion, and the cult-like environment within OneTaste, framing it as a cautionary tale about unchecked corporate and patriarchal abuses in wellness industries.
Center: Centrist sources report the facts of the case, focusing on the legal proceedings and the verdict. They present the background of OneTaste’s practices and the trial details, maintaining a neutral tone without extensive editorializing, emphasizing the importance of justice and legal accountability.
Right: Right-leaning media may focus on the defense’s argument about religious freedom and spiritual practices, framing the case as a potential overreach of government into personal beliefs and freedoms. They might emphasize procedural issues and the protection of constitutional rights, sometimes questioning the motivations behind the prosecution.