An increasing number of young people in Serbia are staying to live with their parents even after the age of 30, marking a shift from previous generations. The reasons are multifaceted: economic insecurity, traditional family models, later marriage and family formation, and close family bonds. Psychologists and sociologists point out that children are often overprotected and there is strong connection and empathy within families, unlike in some Western countries where young people leave home earlier. Economic factors such as youth unemployment and financial dependence on parents further prolong staying in the parental home. While independence is important, many young people and parents see living together as support and security in difficult life circumstances.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning sources tend to emphasize the economic challenges faced by young people, such as unemployment, low wages, and housing affordability, as primary reasons for delayed independence. They highlight the need for social policies to support youth employment and affordable housing. The narrative often includes criticism of neoliberal economic policies that exacerbate youth precarity.
Center: Center-leaning sources present a balanced view, acknowledging both economic factors and cultural/traditional family values that contribute to young people staying longer with parents. They discuss the changing social norms around family and independence, and the practical benefits of multigenerational living. The focus is on understanding the phenomenon without strong ideological bias.
Right: Right-leaning sources often emphasize traditional family values and cultural factors, portraying the extended cohabitation as a sign of strong family bonds and support systems. They may also stress personal responsibility and the importance of young people eventually becoming independent. Economic factors are acknowledged but often framed as secondary to cultural and moral considerations.
